Should you tidy up your corporate group?
Public companies and large private companies that have been incorporated a number of years are likely to have accumulated a number of subsidiaries, some of which will be defunct. In other cases, the subsidiaries may not be actively trading but may have historic liabilities, actual or contingent. In both cases, it may make sense to get rid of these unwanted subsidiaries. What are the alternatives?
Defunct companies may have come into being following an acquisition or group reorganisation, or where a proposed transaction, for which new companies have been incorporated, does not complete. Alternatively, a new company may have been incorporated as a vehicle for marketing a new product, which does not then come to fruition.
These defunct companies may persist simply because no one within the group has responsibility for them — the administrative burden is spread across different departments with the consequence that no one person appreciates the overall cost of their maintenance. The costs of maintaining these subsidiaries can be significant — in wasted management and company secretarial time and audit fees. There are other reasons, unrelated to costs savings, that it can be beneficial to rationalise dormant subsidiaries…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
A misrepresentation is a statement that induces entry into a contract and that turns out to be false.
Marshalling is an equitable remedy for achieving fairness between two or more secured creditors of the same debtor.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents