Should we stay or should we go? Barclays Wealth Trustees (Jersey) Ltd v Erimus Housing Ltd
By Martin McKeague
The recent case of Barclays Wealth Trustees (Jersey) Ltd v Erimus Housing Ltd provides a valuable reminder that remaining in occupation at the end of a fixed-term tenancy can have adverse consequences for tenants as well as landlords.
Where a tenant occupies premises for business purposes, the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 gives the tenant security of tenure when his contractual tenancy comes to an end. The act provides that the tenancy continues on a statutory basis; the tenant may therefore remain in occupation, and he has the right to ask his landlord to grant him a new tenancy. A landlord may only object on certain limited statutory grounds to the grant of a new tenancy.
However, if the parties so wish, by following statutory procedures prior to entering into a lease the landlord and tenant can agree that the tenancy will not have the security of tenure that would otherwise be conferred by the act. Following the statutory procedure creates an ‘excluded tenancy’, which will simply come to an end on the contractual termination date…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
The High Court case of Jarden Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA concerned a dispute about deep fat fryers.
In order to be capable of registration under the Community Designs Regulation, a design must be ‘new’ and have ‘individual character’.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.
New EU rules and lawyers’ increased comfort with digital formats are sparking a sea-change in the way law firms manage their documents