Ship arrest abroad not in breach of undertaking in worldwide freezing order

The Commercial Court decision in the case E v M [2013] EWHC 895 (Comm) is of practical importance because there appears to be no previous authority on one of the principal points considered, namely whether a claimant who has obtained a worldwide freezing order (WFO) from the English Court will be in breach of the standard undertaking in the WFO (not to seek a similar order abroad without the court’s permission) if it subsequently arrests a vessel belonging to the defendant in another jurisdiction in order to obtain security for its claim.

Mr Justice Hamblen held that the arrest did not constitute a breach of the claimant’s undertaking in the WFO and refused to discharge the WFO…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from Ince & Co

View more briefings from Ince & Co

Analysis from The Lawyer

Overview

International House
1 St Katharine's Way
London
E1W 1AY
UK
http://incelaw.com/

Turnover (£m): 86.70
No. of lawyers: 273 (UK 200)
Offices: 11
Qualified lawyers (firm wide): 273
Qualified lawyers (UK total): 140
Qualified lawyers outside London: 133 (International 50)