Shanghai: Chinese Supreme Court strengthens interpretation on respecting the independence of refund guarantees
By Jason Lemann
The Chinese Supreme Court in November 2013 circulated a draft judicial interpretation dealing with cases in relation to independent guarantees.
This appears to be the court’s official response to an increasingly used tactic among shipyards in China whereby a local party (e.g. a Chinese shipyard) seeks to secure claims that they have brought in China (typically based on fraud or other tortious grounds to circumvent the arbitration clauses usually found in shipbuilding contracts) by freezing funds payable under a refund guarantee and/or seeking to prohibit Chinese banks as guarantor from making payment under guarantees the banks have issued.
The court seems to have recognised the danger of frivolous allegations of fraud as well as the importance of maintaining the market’s confidence in bank guarantees issued by Chinese banks. Prior to publication, the court circulated this draft interpretation and invited discussions and debate among representatives from various industries, including banks, shipyards and other stakeholders…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The commercial understanding of the phrases ‘as is’ or ‘as is where is’ has always been that a buyer must take a yacht in the condition in which she is found at the time defined in the contract.
Yacht brokers – or anyone else keen to know when a broker will or will not be due a commission – should read on…