Sexual harassment of an immigrant without a work permit
In Wijesundera v Heathrow 3PL Logistics Ltd (H3PL), the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether W, because she was working illegally, was prevented from bringing a sexual discrimination and harassment claim against her employer.
By law, an employee working under an illegal contract may not be able to rely on certain contractual and statutory employment rights (e.g. unfair dismissal). She may, however, still be able to bring a discrimination claim if it is not so inextricably linked with the illegality that the tribunal would be appearing to condone the illegal conduct if it awarded compensation. The tribunal must consider the circumstances surrounding the claim and illegal conduct, its nature and seriousness, the extent of the employee’s involvement in the illegality and the character of the claim…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
What buildings are affected, what duties are imposed and what action you should take.
HR Update, issue 3: guidance on changing the staff handbook; diabetic employees; flexible leave arrangements; and more
Also: no requirement to take every possible step when investigating whether an employee is disabled.