Separate energy supply agreements for homeowners — subject to 'cooling-off' period?
Many new developments include communal boiler systems or energy centres, which are used to supply hot water and/or electricity to individual homes in order to increase the overall environmental performance of the development. Although the costs of maintaining these installations are generally recovered through service charges, it is common for the costs of actually supplying energy to be collected by way of a separate agreement with homeowners.
A number of our clients have asked recently whether these energy agreements are subject to a ‘cooling-off period’. A cooling-off period is a short period after a consumer signs a contract in which the consumer is permitted to change his or her mind and cancel the contract…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
In Southern v Britannia Hotels Ltd, an employment tribunal granted a significant award of £19,500 to a zero-hours worker who was subjected to harassment by her line manager.
In Williams and Leeds United Football Club the High Court considered whether the claimant was entitled to be paid 12 months’ notice pay, despite having been found by his employer to have sent pornographic images to three individuals five years earlier.