Science fiction or science fact? The Defamation Act 2014
By Mike Ioannides and Amber Melville-Brown
That science and new scientific developments are a vital part of our modern society is reflected in one of the changes brought into defamation law by the new Defamation Act 2013. We now have a shiny new state-of-the-art defence of qualified privilege in relation to peer-reviewed material published in scientific or academic journals.
Scientists and academics have argued for years that there ought to be legislative safeguards in place, enabling them to undertake research, debate important issues and publish results without fear of being sued for defamation.
Back in 2009, leading cardiologist Dr Wilmshurst had been involved in a clinical trial of a medical device designed to close holes in hearts; he had complained at a medical conference that the results from the clinical trial had not been fully published, meaning, he asserted, that the public was not completely aware of issues regarding the safety and effectiveness of the device. Following these comments, he was sued for defamation by the device manufacturer, with the litigation lasting for four years until the manufacturer eventually went into liquidation…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Withers briefing.
News from Withers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Withers
22 April 2014 marked ‘the largest reform of the family justice system any of us have seen or will see in our professional lifetimes’, according to the president of the Family Division.
Withers’ Graham Elliott discusses the points he found most interesting from this year’s Charity Tax Group annual meeting.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A merged Withers and Speechly Bircham would have scaled The Lawyer’s UK 200 with a turnover of about £170m, and created one of the world’s largest specialist private client teams. So what went wrong?