Sale-of-goods exclusion clauses: don’t miss out on a bargain
By Fleur Turrington
It is crucial to cover the full range of potential losses in exclusion clauses. We consider exclusion clauses in sale-of-goods contracts in light of the recent Commercial Court decision of Glencore Energy Ltd v Cirrus Oil Services.
Where a buyer refuses to accept goods under a contract, the seller has the right to claim damages. According to the Sale of Goods Act 1979, if there is an available market at the relevant time for the goods in question, the measure of damages will usually be treated as the difference between the price under the contract and the market price at the time of the non-acceptance.
In other words, if the contract price was the same as the general market price, then the seller will not be viewed as suffering any loss — he could simply sell the goods to another buyer at the same price and would not be out of pocket. However, if the contract price was higher than the market price, then the seller has missed out on the opportunity of selling the goods at the higher price, and will be entitled to be compensated for this ‘loss of a bargain’…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The law provides that if you would like to move a child from their main country of residence, the consent of the other person with parental rights should be obtained first.
There are now a range of options for resolving a dispute between a consumer and a trader.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…