Royal Court of Jersey reconfirms flexible use of just and equitable winding-up jurisdiction
In the matter of the Representation of Huelin-Renouf Shipping Limited  JRC 164, the Royal Court of Jersey has again shown its readiness to utilise the just and equitable winding-up jurisdiction in order to provide a solution not otherwise offered by other insolvency procedures available under Jersey law.
On 20 August 2013, on the application of the board, the Royal Court ordered that Huelin-Renouf Shipping Ltd be wound up under Article 155 of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991, as amended on the basis that it was ‘just and equitable’ to do so.
The Royal Court observed that its jurisdiction under Article 155 of the law had previously been described as a power that should be used flexibly (Jean v Murfitt 1996/237) and that the words ‘just and equitable’ required a flexible interpretation (Leveraged Income Fund Limited 2002/209)…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
On 11 September the Guernsey Court of Appeal confirmed the test to be applied in determining whether a person should be added as a party to existing proceedings.
When a company is being wound up in the jurisdiction where it is incorporated, should an anti-suit injunction be issued to prevent a creditor or member from pursuing proceedings in another jurisdiction?