Royal Court emphasises duty of plaintiff to advance proceedings
In this case, the Royal Court emphasised the onus on a plaintiff to ensure their case is progressed expeditiously and the need to balance that obligation with article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, namely the right to a fair trial.
This appeal was brought by the plaintiff against a decision of the Master on 11 December 2013 to strike out the plaintiff’s claim pursuant of Rule 6/13(1)(d) of the Royal Court Rules 2004 as amended. The grounds for the decision were that there had been an inordinate delay in the progress of the claim such that it would be an abuse of the process of the court if the plaintiff were to be permitted to continue.
The claim itself related to a motor accident that took place on 4 October 2007, wherein the plaintiff alleges that the defendant negligently struck the plaintiff who was riding a motorcycle. The plaintiff sustained injuries. The plaintiff’s claim was later quantified in the region of £30,000 to £35,000. The defendant denied liability…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
Guernsey was the first jurisdiction to introduce the concept of a protected cell company but the Companies Law has effectively modernised it.
Top tips for dealing with a JFSC on-site examination; guidance on investment business on-site examinations and an important decision of the Royal Court concerning the information a party subject to regulatory action should be provided with.