Rouse v Wachovia: a victory for national banks
By Julia M Brighton and Isabelle Ord
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in Rouse v Wachovia Mortgage, FSB that under 28 USC § 1348, ‘a national bank is “located” only in the state designated as its main office’. This ruling resolves the important federal court diversity jurisdiction question of ‘whether under 28 USC § 1348, a national bank is a citizen of both the state in which its principal place of business is located and the state where its main office is located as designated in the bank’s articles of association’.
As a result, Rouse creates a significant federal court removal advantage for national banks by allowing them to choose a remote state as the location of their main office to create federal court diversity jurisdiction in all other states where the banks have significant business activities…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
In the midst of the gale-force winds of commentary whipped up by the Google case, we should pause and ask ourselves: just how ground-breaking is this decision?
The shocking news of recent airline disasters brings into sharp focus for employers the sometimes unforeseeable risks facing employees who frequently travel for work.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions