Robocalls and third-party violations: FCC rules on vicarious liability under the TCPA
By Perrie Michael Weiner, Esteban Morales and Joshua Briones
The Federal Communications Commission recently clarified whether parties on whose behalf telemarketing ‘robocalls’ are made may be liable for third-party violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).
Retailers who did not actually place calls may only be ‘vicariously‘ liable and subject to damages for third-party TCPA violations if federal common law principles of agency apply.
The TCPA was enacted to regulate and monitor the use of telemarketing to consumers. Among other things, Section 227(b) prohibits calls made without consent and using ‘automatic telephone dialing systems’ (as that term is defined by the TCPA). Section 227(c) makes it unlawful to ‘initiate any telephone solicitation… to any residential telephone subscriber who has registered his or her telephone number on the national do-not-call registry.’ Under both sections, private parties may seek to recover damages and injunctive relief…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Employers have a much greater opportunity to collect and retain vast amounts of information. This information is useful to have on file — but what are the risks?
The anonymous nature of Bitcoin payments has caught the attention of tax authorities and other regulators, both in Australia and overseas.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The fragile refinance market is back in rude health and US-style alternative lenders are stepping up with innovative structures to sustain the recovery
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies