RMIT ordered to reinstate redundant academic
By Angela Weber
In this decision, recently retired Justice Gray of the Federal Court of Australia found that the selection of an academic for redundancy was unlawful adverse action and that RMIT had undertaken the redundancy process as a ‘pretext for getting rid of an undesired employee’.
This case highlights two things: first, the importance of those involved keeping clear contemporaneous records around redundancy processes and decisions. This will assist in defending any adverse action (and other) claims around the redundancy; and second, the standard required for an employer to discharge the reverse onus of proof when an adverse action claim is made. In Justice Gray’s view, an employer must provide evidence not only as to the real reasons for the decision, but must also directly answer the employee’s allegations. The employee’s allegations need to be directly put to the decision-maker and positively denied.
Relevantly in this instance: section 340(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) prohibits a person from taking adverse action against another person because the other person had a workplace right, has or has not exercised a workplace right or proposes or proposes not to exercise a workplace right. Among other things, a workplace right includes the ability of an employee to make a complaint or enquiry in relation to his or her employment…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
High Court decides: liquidators of insolvent landlords can disclaim leases with the effect of extinguishing the tenant’s leasehold interest
In Willmott Growers Group Inc v Willmott Forests Limited, the majority of the High Court upheld the Victorian Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the liquidators of an insolvent landlord can disclaim a lease.
Queensland recently brought an interlocutory application seeking a declaration that its laws were valid until a court finally determined otherwise.
Analysis from The Lawyer
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out