Rihanna image infringed by Topshop
By Gary Assim
The High Court has ruled in favour of pop star Rihanna against high-street clothes retailer Topshop, which used an unauthorised image of her (almost identical to one used on her CD) on some of its T-shirts.
Customers had believed it was an approved image, so the High Court confirmed Topshop was guilty of passing off.
While the judge stated that there is no ‘general right by a famous person to control the reproduction of their image’, Rihanna’s image, and the reputation in it, were the important factors in this case…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The Court of Appeal has found in favour of a business tenant and decided that a periodic tenancy had not been created in the intervening period.
Careful drafting is usually required for restrictive covenants to be enforceable, although Prophet plc v Huggett provides the exception to the rule.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…