Right-of-light update: a lighter touch by the courts
By Simon Pestell
The recent Supreme Court case of Coventry and others v Lawrence and another (2014) UKSC 13 should be welcomed by developers, as it heralds a shift in the court’s approach to the exercise of its discretion to award damages instead of an injunction.
Following a number of recent cases, developers have been negotiating in the knowledge that an injunction is likely to be granted in almost every case where the development would cause a significant interference with the access of light to a neighbouring property that enjoys a right of light.
The basic finding of Lord Neuberger in Coventry v Lawrence was that the courts had been applying the classic test as to whether damages should be granted instead of an injunction too strictly. The test was formulated in the landmark case of Shelfer v City of London Electric Lighting Co (1895) and states that the court should consider awarding damages instead of an injunction if all the following criteria are met..
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The Brussels I Regulation (Recast) comes into force on 10 January 2015 bringing with it the promise of significant improvements to the jurisdictional regime within the EU.
We want to obtain a closure order and then use the new absolute ground for possession under the ASBCPA 2014. Does the tenancy agreement have to state the new ground before we can do this?
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…