Retention-of-title clause prevents seller suing for the price of goods
A recent Court of Appeal case explains the dangers of sellers relying upon valid retention-of-title (ROT) provisions where they want the price, not the goods, back.
In order to maintain an action for the price of goods sold, a seller must fall within the criteria set out in section 49 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979, which is mandatory, not permissive, in nature; and a valid ROT provision that prevents title passing to a buyer means a seller’s terms and conditions must specify a date certain irrespective of delivery if he is to be able to maintain an action for the price of the goods.
In the case, C sold goods to JH on ROT terms. It was held that title to the goods had been validly reserved by C. When C sued JH for the price, JH argued that C could not bring itself within either s49(1) or s49(2) of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 and so could not sue for the price as one or other of those criteria were mandatory before an action for the price could be maintained. C could not meet the criteria in 49(1) because title had not passed to JH. It could not bring itself within 49(2) because the goods had been delivered and there was no date certain on which the invoices outstanding could be said to be due because of a series of rescheduling agreements…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Taylor Wessing
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Taylor Wessing
For the tax year from 6 April 2014, the standard lifetime allowance has reduced from £1.5m to £1.25m.
One of the areas highlighted last year by the Regulator was the regulation of workplace DC pension schemes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014.
The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world