Restriction on tenant’s use was unlawful

By Sarah Moore and Nick Wood

A proposed restriction on a tenant’s use of its property has been struck down as void under competition law (Martin Retail Group Ltd v Crawley Borough Council). This is the first reported case on how competition law applies to a user covenant in a lease.

In this case, the tenant was Martin Retail Group, which operated a newsagent in a parade of shops in Crawley, Sussex. The parade was in the centre of a housing estate and both the parade and the majority of the houses on the estate were owned by Crawley Borough Council.

The dispute between Martin’s and the council arose when Martin’s wanted to renew its lease under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954. Martin’s wanted to expand the user clause in its lease, to enable it to sell alcohol and convenience goods. The council objected to this and proposed a clause that expressly excluded the sale of alcohol, grocery and convenience goods…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


Lacon House
84 Theobald's Road

Turnover (£m): 116.70
No. of lawyers: 405