Responding to fraud — policy in the pipeline
We live in an environment where new allegations of fraud arise daily or where the press announces that fraudsters are using new technologies to ‘clone, phish, spoof or pharm’. Increasingly, therefore, the focus of government, law enforcement and regulators is to maximise the pressure on business to reduce those risks. This can be done in two ways: (1) criminalising corporates who are involved in such conduct; and (2) requiring businesses to have systems and controls in place that prevent certain types of criminality.
As part of the current focus on trying to put the onus on business to reduce the risks we as a society face from fraud, both the Labour Party and the director of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO), David Green, have called recently for reform of the law on corporate criminal liability and an easing of what we term the rules of attribution. ‘Attribution’ is the mechanism by which a corporate can be liable for a criminal offence that requires proof of some form of knowledge/intent (mens rea). Strict liability offences for corporates are relatively straightforward, requiring only the proof of the actus reus of the offence. The rationale for such liability is clear, prevention of accidents at work, for example. By contrast, in respect of offences requiring proof of mens rea, a corporate will usually only be liable where the directing mind and will of the corporate is him/herself individually liable for the commission of the same offence. Thus it is only where the board of directors, or those in effect directly below board level (together ‘the directing mind and will’), would be liable for the same offence that a corporate will be found liable for the commission of a criminal offence…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Addleshaw Goddard briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Addleshaw Goddard
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Addleshaw Goddard
InCredit — new rules on credit broking fees and financial promotions; FCA webpage on rules for loan-based crowdfunding platforms; CML responds on FPC direction powers
This edition includes new rules on credit broking fees, the Q3 SME lending stats and the European Banking Authority’s thoughts on credit institutions.
InCredit – FCA structural changes; speech by CEO of Competition & Markets Authority; PRA update on implementing BRRD; and more
Addleshaw Goddard’s weekly publication provides information on current retail finance issues, regulatory and legislative developments, market watch and ASA adjudications.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
Could Slater & Gordon achieve its stated aim of becoming a top consumer brand by acquiring Pannone?