Removal of police dog from pregnant handler was direct discrimination
In the case of Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v Keohane [UKEAT/0463/12/RN], the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the removal of a police dog from its pregnant handler during her maternity leave constituted direct discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity.
The employee in question was a police dog handler, in charge of two search dogs. In October 2010, she informed her employer that she was pregnant — as a result, she was taken off operational duties for health and safety reasons. The police (in line with their policy of re-allocating or withdrawing police dogs where handlers were likely to be non-operational for a while) subsequently decided to re-allocate the employee’s ‘passive’ search dog, Nunki Pippin. In October 2011, the police decided not to return Nunki Pippin to the employee…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Kemp Little briefing.
News from Kemp Little
Briefings from Kemp Little
As cloud services develop and mature, one of the key differentiators between suppliers is the service-level agreements they are willing to offer.
For a number of years, lawyers have debated the issue of whether it is an infringement of copyright to link to or frame online content owned by a third party.