Removal of police dog from pregnant handler was direct discrimination

In the case of Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis v Keohane [UKEAT/0463/12/RN], the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) held that the removal of a police dog from its pregnant handler during her maternity leave constituted direct discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy and maternity.

The employee in question was a police dog handler, in charge of two search dogs. In October 2010, she informed her employer that she was pregnant — as a result, she was taken off operational duties for health and safety reasons. The police (in line with their policy of re-allocating or withdrawing police dogs where handlers were likely to be non-operational for a while) subsequently decided to re-allocate the employee’s ‘passive’ search dog, Nunki Pippin. In October 2011, the police decided not to return Nunki Pippin to the employee…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Kemp Little briefing.

Briefings from Kemp Little

View more briefings from Kemp Little

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • sapling

    Profit on the margins

    You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories

  • Chart4

    Good offices

    Making the most of your office space is a management priority these days, as exclusive new data in the UK 200 reveals


Cheapside House
138 Cheapside

Turnover (£m): 8.50
No. of lawyers: 52