Relaxation of short-term rent laws in London and PRS
In recent years, a number of developers and private landlords have become unstuck by a little-known legal provision set out in section 25 of the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1973 (the 1973 Act) that applies to residential dwellings (in use class C3) in London only.
The effect of this provision is that where a dwelling is used as temporary sleeping accommodation (i.e. used by the same person for less than 90 consecutive nights) this will be regarded as a material change in use of that dwelling and will constitute ‘development’ for the purposes of section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
In such circumstances, there is deemed to be a breach of planning control, namely a material change of use requiring the grant of planning permission. No offence is committed, but like all breaches of planning control, the breach opens the possibility of enforcement action by the local planning authority if they considered such action expedient…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
In Southern v Britannia Hotels Ltd, an employment tribunal granted a significant award of £19,500 to a zero-hours worker who was subjected to harassment by her line manager.
In Williams and Leeds United Football Club the High Court considered whether the claimant was entitled to be paid 12 months’ notice pay, despite having been found by his employer to have sent pornographic images to three individuals five years earlier.