Regulation on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories
Following some uncertainty in early February 2013 in respect of whether the European Parliament would object to certain EMIR regulatory technical standards, it finally accepted the six draft standards and they entered into force on 15 March 2013.
The six RTS relate to: (i) Trade repositories (including the minimum details of the data to be reported to trade repositories and the data to be published and made available by trade repositories); (ii) Capital and other requirements for central counterparties (CCPs); (iii) Risk mitigation techniques for OTC derivatives contracts not cleared by a CCP (other than collateral requirements - as to which see further below), indirect clearing arrangements, the clearing obligation, the public register, access to a trading venue and non-financial counterparties (NFCs).
Upon entry into force, some of the RTS apply immediately (for example, those relating to timely confirmation - pursuant to which financial counterparties (FCs) and NFCs must confirm OTC derivative transactions within certain prescribed time frames and FCs must have procedures in place to report on a monthly basis the number of OTC derivative transactions that have been outstanding for more than five business days - and mark-to-market valuation - pursuant to which FCs and NFC+s are required to value outstanding OTC derivative contracts on a daily basis). However, it is worth noting that the European Commission EMIR FAQs published on 8 February 2013 recognise that it may not be possible to effect timely confirmations immediately and so Member States will be given some flexibility in respect of how this RTS will be applied - at least initially…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Allen & Overy
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Allen & Overy
Federal Circuit limits ITC authority to remedy patent infringement claims based on induced infringement
A limited exclusion order under section 337 may not be predicated on a theory of induced infringement when the subject imported product did not directly infringe before or at importation.
Federal regulators have voted to approve the ‘Volcker Rule’, more than two years after the rule’s proposal in 2011.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Advisers get stuck into the disentangling task, to unhitch troubled bank from group
Shell legal director Peter Rees is switching litigation control away from external counsel to a unified global team of in-housers