Refusal to make reasonable adjustments: when does the time limit begin to run?
By Michael Halsey
An employer’s refusal to make a reasonable adjustment is a continuing act if the employer’s policy is to keep that refusal under review. The time limit for an employee to bring a claim will not run from the initial refusal but will be a continuing act.
This article considers the recent Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision in Secretary of State for Work & Pensions (Jobcentre Plus) v Jamil & Ors.
The claimant worked for the respondent, Jobcentre Plus, in Ealing approximately one hour and 20 minutes from her home. After developing a disability in November 2010, the claimant requested to be relocated to an office in Uxbridge closer to her home. The respondent refused the request, asserting that the reason was there were no available vacancies. There was evidence that the real reason for the refusal was that the claimant’s husband was employed at the Uxbridge office. On this basis, the original tribunal found that the refusal to move the claimant amounted to a failure to make a reasonable adjustment…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Veale Wasbrough Vizards briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Veale Wasbrough Vizards
Squatting in residential premises has been a criminal offence since September 2012. However, this month, a case has considered this in relation to the law of adverse possession.
The EAT has found that while age discriminatory comments had been made to a former employee, these had not formed a material part of the employee’s constructive dismissal.
Analysis from The Lawyer
You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories