Reforms to judicial review
In April this year, the government announced that it would be pressing ahead with its proposal to reduce the time limit for filing a claim for judicial review from three months to six weeks in planning law cases. The reform was brought into effect on 1 July by the Civil Procedure (Amendment No. 4) Rules 2013.
The change came about despite the majority (67 per cent) of consultation responses opposing it. Most opposition came from representative bodies, members of the public and the legal profession, but support was stronger from businesses and public authorities…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why