Redundancy compensation linked to pension entitlement challenged on age grounds
Under a civil service voluntary exit scheme, employees aged 60 or over (and therefore eligible to draw a full pension under the pension scheme) had their severance compensation capped at six months’ pay. Employees under the age of 60 were not subject to the same cap.
The tribunal hearing in Smith v Department of Business & Skills was to decide a preliminary point of whether there was a material difference between the claimants’ circumstances and those of their comparators. The tribunal decided that they were in materially different circumstances, essentially because they were entitled to an unreduced pension, so they could not bring their age discrimination claim.
The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the appeal. They did not accept the argument that the key to the payment of increased compensation was not age, but liability to reduction in pension…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump