Recent decision reinforces the importance of perfection under the Personal Properties Securities Act 2009
On 27 June 2013, Brereton J of the Supreme Court of NSW gave judgment in the matter of Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd; Richard Albarran and Blair Alexander Pleash as receivers and managers of Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd & Ors v Queensland Excavation Services Pty Ltd & Ors  NSWSC 852, a case that dealt with priorities under the Personal Properties Securities Act 2009 (PPSA).
This decision highlights the dangers of not perfecting a security interest and confirms that Australian courts will look to decisions of the Canadian and New Zealand courts for guidance when interpreting the PPSA.
In May and August 2010, the first defendant, Queensland Excavation Services (QES), purchased caterpillar excavators (Excavators). Concurrently, QES leased the Excavators to Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd (Maiden) for civil construction work in the Northern Territory (Leases). The Leases were not registered by QES under the PPSA or by any other means…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
China’s eagerly anticipated amendments to its Trademark Law will come into force on 1 May 2014
Tougher product liability provisions following the release of long-awaited amendments to consumer rights and interests protection law in China
The rise of consumerism in China over the past 10 years has spurred greater regulatory enforcement in the area of product liability.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies
Our list of the summer’s big deals shows how London law firms kept busy with work from Asia as well as more familiar sources