Recent case law only highlights the subjective nature of what constitutes breach of contract
Recent case law has confirmed the level of difficulty encountered when attempting to persuade the courts to intervene at an early stage in trust disciplinary proceedings.
That the courts may intervene where it is deemed appropriate was clearly stated in Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust  UKSC 58, in which Lord Dyson said that where an employer starts a disciplinary process in breach of an express term of the employment contract ‘it is open to the employee to seek an injunction to stop the process and/or to seek an appropriate declaration’.
The courts thus retain their supervisory jurisdiction. Where the action complained of is the referral to a disciplinary panel, Lord Justice Pill stated as follows in Skidmore v Dartford & Gravesham NHS Trust  ICR 721: ‘I accept that there is a threshold to be crossed, in terms of seriousness, before a decision to refer to a panel can be properly taken.’ …
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Outer Temple Chambers briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Outer Temple Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Outer Temple Chambers
Police ordered to pay Human Rights Act damages for failure to conduct an adequate investigation into allegations of rape
Katarina Sydow examines the High Court’s decision to award Human Rights Act damages in respect of an inadequate police investigation following allegations of rape.
Experts’ literature deserves more attention in the earlier stages of cases because of the devastating effect that it can have at trial.