Recent amendments to the arbitration rules of US-based institutions
By Kiran N Gore
Over the last few months, several global arbitration institutions have introduced amendments to their arbitral rules. In the US alone, both the American Arbitration Association (AAA) and the International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution (CPR) have introduced and implemented such amendments.
In November 2013, the AAA issued new Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures for use in commercial matters (the ‘Commercial Rules’), which are available for use in domestic and international disputes, administered either by the AAA or the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (IDCR). The Commercial Rules incorporate substantial revisions, including the availability of immediate injunctive relief, the availability of dispositive motion practice, greater arbitrator control over the discovery process and a new appellate review procedure. Each of these developments are responsive to a perceived need for additional relief mechanisms during an arbitration.
Specifically, Rule 9 now mandates mediation for arbitrations involving disputes concerning a claim for more than $75,000 (£45,000). Rule 22 limits discovery to documents ‘relevant and material to the outcome of the disputed issues’. While this requirement is generally consistent with the frequently used IBA Rules on the Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration, it is narrower than the requirements imposed by the rules used in US federal courts and provides a benchmark more in line with international standards. Rule 22 further empowers arbitrators with greater control over the discovery process. Finally, Rules 23, 38 and 58 work together to provide mechanisms for emergency relief and sanctions against a party for failure to comply with the rules or an arbitrator’s instructions…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Health Alert — Appleton v Norris; Psychology Board of Australia v GA; Reben v Medical Board of Australia; and more
DLA Piper has released the 15 September 2014 issue of its Health Alert, which focuses on judgments, legislation and reports in the health sector.
What if you had to return all the revenue you received from every customer in California for the last several years?
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions