Receiver entitled to remuneration as officer of the court
The Court of Appeal has found that a receiver appointed under the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 1988, but discharged in 2006, was still entitled to be recover sums from the receivership assets as ‘he continues to be an officer of the court [and subject to the supervision of the court] to the extent that he still has functions to perform with a view to a final conclusion of the administration of the receivership’.
The legal position is generally such that a receiver appointed to the assets of an individual under the CJA 1988, like a receiver appointed at common law, pays its remuneration for acting as receiver from the assets subject to the receivership.
In Glatt v Sinclair, a receiver was appointed in 2001 under the CJA 1988 over Glatt’s assets, with the order stating that the receiver was to be paid out of the receivership assets. However, in 2006 Glatt successfully applied to have the confiscation order made against him set aside and subsequently the receiver was discharged…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
In the recent case of West v Ian Finlay & Associates, the Court of Appeal found that net contribution clauses ‘are by no means unusual’.
The Financial Reporting Council has published changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.