Re-reading the Riot Act (again): police liable for consequential losses under the Riot (Damages) Act 1886
As if a lecture at the Police Federation Conference from the home secretary wasn’t enough, the police have also recently received the Court of Appeal’s reading of the riot act. In a decision that opens the door for insurers and businesses to claim further compensation from the police for losses incurred in the 2011 English riots, the Court of Appeal has overturned last year’s High Court ruling that compensation under the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 (RDA) is only for direct physical damage caused to a building and its contents.
Under the ruling, the police are also liable for consequential losses including business interruption and loss of rent. The court has also clarified what qualifies as a ‘riot’.
Confirmation of the broad scope of compensation payable under the RDA will strengthen calls for the RDA to be reformed. If that happens, insurance premiums are likely to increase and property in riot-prone areas will become more difficult to insure…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Cour de Cassation quashes decision that disregarded ICC rule on time limits to arbitrator challenges — two takeaways
This milestone decision further limits the scope for French courts to annul arbitration awards and reinforces the efficiency of France-seated arbitral proceedings.
This decision is in line with a possible judicial trend towards enforceability of good faith obligations under English law.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions