Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman

Ramifications of the Supreme Court’s McCutcheon campaign finance ruling

By Frederick K Lowell, Emily B Erlingsson, Kathryn E Donovan and Anita D Stearns Mayo

The US Supreme Court’s decision in an important campaign finance case frees individual political donors to contribute to an unlimited number of federal campaigns and committees, as long as each contribution is within statutory base limits.

In McCutcheon v FEC, the Supreme Court ruled that the overall aggregate biennial limits are invalid under the First Amendment. The court opined that the aggregate limits do not address the concern of preventing corruption, but instead seriously restrict participation in the democratic process.

The overall aggregate biennial limits are no longer valid ($48,600 [£29,300] and $74,600). Therefore, individuals may contribute to as many different candidates or committees as they would like, subject to the base limits, without violating any restrictions…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Pillsbury briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.


Tower 42, Level 23
25 Old Broad Street