Putting it in proportion — redundancy scheme did not discriminate on age grounds
The claimant, a government administrative officer, took voluntary redundancy at the age of 26. The rules of the Civil Service redundancy scheme had an age banding structure that gave considerably more to those who were older. The claimant, who had almost eight years’ service, was entitled to £10,849.04. Had she been over 35 rather than under 30, she would have been entitled to a further £17,690.58. She brought a claim for direct age discrimination in the tribunal, which she lost.
The tribunal (whose decision was upheld by the Employment Appeal Tribunal) decided that there were ‘material differences’ between the age groups; younger employees had fewer financial and family obligations and could be expected to find other work more easily than older employees. This meant she could not compare herself with an older worker and so the tribunal rejected the claim.
But they went on to say that, in any event, her treatment was objectively justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim — to provide a financial cushion until alternative employment (or the receipt of a pension)…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The government has issued a response to its consultation on the administration of shared parental leave and pay.
A contract for insulation work on boilers at a power station was originally granted to Kitsons in December 2010.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies
The Russian legal market faces a new era as the government opens the door to greater business transparency, but not everything is open to scrutiny