Pursuing antitrust claims for LIBOR manipulation in England
Many readers will know that the US Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal by plaintiffs whose antitrust claims over LIBOR manipulation were dismissed last year by New York Southern District Judge Naomi Buchwald.
Even if the appeal fails, as we reported at the time, the Buchwald decision would not be mirrored in England because of differences between European and US antitrust laws.
This was confirmed last December when the European Commission fined a group of banks €1.71bn (£996m) for infringement of antitrust laws in their manipulation of LIBOR and another interest rate benchmark, EURIBOR…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Collyer Bristow briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Collyer Bristow
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Collyer Bristow
The most significant IP/competition law crossover case since our last edition of IP Matters is the EU Court of Justice decision in Huawei v ZTE.
A class action against 12 major banks for antitrust activity in the credit default swaps market presents an opportunity to review where things have got to in the European Commission’s investigation of anticompetitive conduct.