Provision of accommodation is not 'payment' that may be withheld if protected industrial action is taken
By Lillian Rizio
The High Court of Australia has held that the provision of accommodation to employees does not constitute a ‘payment’ to those employees and should not be withheld in circumstances where section 470(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009(Cth) (FW Act) dictates payments are to be withheld because employees have engaged in industrial action.
The decision makes clear that section 470(1) is designed to prohibit payment of wages to employees during periods of industrial action, rather than provision of other benefits. Accordingly, employers should be wary of seeking to withhold other types of benefits during periods of industrial action, as this might amount to adverse action under the general protection provisions of the FW Act…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
Principals and contractors need to be aware that in not registering security interests under the PPSA 2009, they may risk serious consequences.
The New Companies Ordinance (NCO) will come into effect on 3 March 2014. It includes changes that affect the way documents may be executed.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shanghai’s ground-breaking Pilot Free Trade Zone could mark the beginning of the long-awaited liberalisation of China’s legal services sector.
Hong Kong IPO activity is hotting up again, but UK legal stalwarts are looking over their shoulders as US rivals make up ground fast