Provision of accommodation is not 'payment' that may be withheld if protected industrial action is taken
By Lillian Rizio
The High Court of Australia has held that the provision of accommodation to employees does not constitute a ‘payment’ to those employees and should not be withheld in circumstances where section 470(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009(Cth) (FW Act) dictates payments are to be withheld because employees have engaged in industrial action.
The decision makes clear that section 470(1) is designed to prohibit payment of wages to employees during periods of industrial action, rather than provision of other benefits. Accordingly, employers should be wary of seeking to withhold other types of benefits during periods of industrial action, as this might amount to adverse action under the general protection provisions of the FW Act…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from King & Wood Mallesons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons
High Court decides: liquidators of insolvent landlords can disclaim leases with the effect of extinguishing the tenant’s leasehold interest
In Willmott Growers Group Inc v Willmott Forests Limited, the majority of the High Court upheld the Victorian Court of Appeal’s conclusion that the liquidators of an insolvent landlord can disclaim a lease.
Queensland recently brought an interlocutory application seeking a declaration that its laws were valid until a court finally determined otherwise.
Analysis from The Lawyer
All-encompassing change is now a reality for the UK’s top 200 firms. How are they coping with the unprecedented upheaval? The Lawyer finds out