Proposed CFTC rules on position limits
By Byungkwon Lim and Aaron J Levy
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act amended section 4a of the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) to require the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to establish position limits on an aggregate basis for (1) futures and options contracts on agricultural and exempt commodities traded on or subject to the rules of a designated contract market (DCM) and (2) contracts based on the same underlying commodity as such futures and option contracts, including (a) swaps listed for trading by a DCM or swap execution facility (SEF), (b) swaps that are not traded on a DCM, SEF or other registered entity but that are determined to perform or affect a ‘significant price discovery function’ (SPDF swaps) and (c) foreign board of trade (FBOT) contracts that are price-linked to a DCM or SEF contract and made available for trading on the FBOT by direct access from within the US.
On 18 October 2011, the CFTC adopted final rules on position limits for 28 exempt and agricultural commodity futures and options contracts and swaps that are economically equivalent to such contracts as Part 151 of its regulations. On 30 May 2012, the CFTC published proposed modifications to Part 151 addressing the policy for certain aspects of aggregation requirements in determining position limits.
However, on 28 September 2012, the US District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order in International Swaps and Derivatives Association v United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission that generally vacated those final rules and remanded the matter to the CFTC. The District Court rejected the CFTC’s contention that section 4a of the CEA unambiguously mandated the imposition of position limits without any finding that such limits are necessary ‘to diminish, eliminate or prevent excessive speculation’ and held that it was therefore required to remand the matter to the CFTC to ‘fill in the gaps and resolve the ambiguities’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Debevoise & Plimpton briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Debevoise & Plimpton
This client update focuses on the examination priorities that are most relevant to investment advisers to private equity and hedge funds.
Debevoise & Plimption has published its FCPA Update for January 2013. The lead article concerns anti-corruption compliance in 2013.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shell legal director Peter Rees is switching litigation control away from external counsel to a unified global team of in-housers