King & Wood Mallesons

Asia-Pacific 100 position: 3

Proportionate liability — restored to working order

Since 2009, the scope of proportionate liability legislation across all Australian jurisdictions has been severely constrained by the imposition of a very high hurdle by the Victorian Court of Appeal in St George Bank v Quinerts (2009) 25 VR 666. Unless tortfeasor A could show that the acts of tortfeasor B contributed to tortfeasor A’s wrongful actions, proportionate liability provisions were not enlivened. Quinerts has since been followed by a five-member bench of the NSW Court of Appeal in Mitchell Morgan v Vella (2011) 16 BPR 30,189.

Yesterday, the High Court delivered a significant decision (Hunt & Hunt v Mitchell Morgan [2013] HCA 10) which overturned the decision in Vella and dismissed much of the reasoning in Quinerts. In doing so, the High Court has confirmed that proportionate liability legislation will have a significant role to play in many disputes where the actions of more than one party were involved in the losses claimed…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the King & Wood Mallesons briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.


Briefings from King & Wood Mallesons

View more briefings from King & Wood Mallesons

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


Level 61, Governor Phillip Tower
1 Farrer Place
NSW 2000

Jurisdiction: PRC/Australia
No. of offices: 20
No. of qualified lawyers: 1,252