Property Update — February 2014: Re Game Station — the Court of Appeal has overturned the law on administrators paying rent
By Martin Thomas
On 24 February 2014, the Court of Appeal issued its judgment in the Game case: Jervis & Anr v Pillar Denton Ltd & Ors. The court overturned the law relating to an administrator’s liability to pay rent on leasehold premises, as set out in the 2009 case of Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd and the 2012 case of Leisure Norwich (II) Ltd and others v Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd (in administration) and others.
The Game case was brought by a consortium of landlords against the administrators of the Game companies, and also against the successor company, Game Retail Ltd, which had indemnified the administrators against these claims.
The administrators were appointed the day after the March quarter day in 2012, and claims brought by the landlords for unpaid rent (said, in submissions, to be around £3m) were treated by the administrators as ‘normal’ debts in the administration. This meant that the landlords were unlikely to be paid in any substantial amount…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
‘Swiss’ form patent claims do not need subjective intent for infringement: Court of Appeal rules in Warner-Lambert v Actavis
The English Court of Appeal has issued considered, well-reasoned guidance on the construction of patent claims in ‘Swiss’ form. The decision is likely to have impact well beyond British shores.
Employment Update – June 2015: EAT and public interest, inappropriate Facebook posts, TUPE podcasts, and more
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s employment and equalities experts bring you the latest developments that may affect your business - what they are, and what you can do about them.