Property Update — February 2014: Land Registry
By Dale Roberts
The 2001 Law Commission Report (Law Com No. 271), ‘Land registration for the 21st century: a conveyancing revolution’, led to the introduction of the Land Registration Act 2002 (LRA 2002). This replaced the 1925 version of that act.
The fundamental objective of the title register system, as detailed in the report, is to provide ‘a complete and accurate reflection of the state of the title of the land at any given time’. The LRA 2002 was the legislation by which this would be achieved.
Elsewhere in the report, the Law Commission acknowledged that one of the primary purposes behind the entry of a unilateral notice — a new device introduced by the LRA 2002 — was to preserve commercial confidentiality…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s finance litigation experts bring you the latest on the cases and issues affecting the lending industry.
Eli Lilly succeeds in overturning award of DNIs regarding UK, FR, IT and ES designations of its European patent
The Court of Appeal has delivered its long-awaited judgment in the Actavis v Eli Lillydispute, ruling that Actavis is not entitled to a declaration of noninfringement (DNI) of Eli Lilly’s European patent.