Any recorded communication (for example emails, taped phone conversations including voicemails, letters, memoranda, computer records and so on) may have to be produced to the other party in a subsequent dispute/legal proceeding if the record is relevant to the proceedings. One exception is where the record is privileged.
Privilege can protect confidential communications between lawyers (in house or external) and clients where the purpose of the communication is to seek/obtain legal advice (legal advice privilege). It will also protect some confidential communications with third parties, where there are actual or likely proceedings (litigation privilege).
This flowchart and briefing highlight the key points from an English law perspective, including some common pitfalls and how to avoid them. However, privilege is a complex area of the law and you should therefore seek specific guidance from your in-house counsel or external lawyers in any given situation…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump