Private equity update: the BAA case — VAT on company acquisition costs
Back in April 2013, Wragge & Co reported on the Court of Appeal judgment in BAA Ltd v HMRC  EWCA Civ 112.
In this case, the Court of Appeal rejected an appeal against the decisions of the upper-tier tribunal and the first-tier tribunal not to allow an acquisition vehicle, Airport Development and Investments Ltd (ADIL), to recover VAT on certain advisory fees incurred in connection with the takeover of the airports operator BAA…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Court of Appeal confirms no English celebrity image right but Topshop’s Rihanna T-shirt was passing off
The Court of Appeal has delivered its decision in the litigation between Rihanna and Topshop, upholding the trial judge’s finding that Topshop’s unauthorised use of Rihanna’s image on a T-shirt was passing off.
Prohibition notices are serious enforcement measures that form part of the recipient’s criminal record and can be costl