Prince v ACE: extra-territorial effect of US tax laws?
By Rahim Punjani
Should a Canadian court exercise its jurisdiction to hear a class action lawsuit against Air Canada for improperly collecting US travel taxes on ticket purchases in Canada and on air travel in Canada?
That was the question in Prince v ACE Aviation Holdings Inc (2014 ONCA 285), in which the Ontario Court of Appeal declined to exercise its jurisdiction and stayed the class action on the basis that the US was clearly a more appropriate forum until the plaintiffs exhaust their rights in the US by first applying to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for a refund and, if refused, appealing to the US courts.
In Prince, a class action was commenced in Ontario against Air Canada for improperly collecting US travel taxes on ticket purchases in Canada and on air travel in Canada. Effectively, the plaintiffs alleged that Air Canada was giving extra-territorial effect to US tax laws. The plaintiffs claim raised issues about the taxes imposed by the US government, the methods used to collect those taxes, the immunity conferred on intermediaries who collect the taxes, the procedures established for the recovery of those taxes and the interpretation of the taxing statute…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
The Canadian Securities Administrators has announced that it intends to publish a new proposal for changes to the regulation of takeover bids.
On 16 September, Tax Law360 published an article quoting Todd Welty regarding the case Schaeffler et al v United States No. 14-1965 (2d Cir.).
Analysis from The Lawyer
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.