Practical tips for parties to settlement agreements
The recent decision in Interserve Industrial Services Ltd v ZRE Katowice SA  EWHC 3205 (TCC) (9 November 2012) highlights the importance the court places on the dispute resolution mechanism in the main contracts between the parties and the importance of making clear in any settlement agreement how disputes arising under the settlement agreement are to be determined.
The case arose out of scaffolding and insulation works carried out at Pembroke CCGT power station in West Pennar in Pembrokeshire. The claimant (Interserve) and the defendant (ZRE) had entered into two construction contracts in respect of these works, both of which contained provisions stating that arbitration was to be the final dispute resolution mechanism. The works were delayed and when Interserve applied for various payments ZRE declined to make payment alleging a right of set-off. This dispute was settled by way of a settlement agreement that provided that it was governed by English law and that the English court ‘shall have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of any dispute arising under this agreement’. Interserve then alleged that ZRE had breached the terms of the settlement agreement and sought to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement in court proceedings…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe