Potential expansion for establishing jurisdiction against would-be defendants in Europe
By Zoe Bent
The decision in AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier, Dr Meier & Dr Gunter Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbH  EWHC 1085 (Comm) may result in a potentially more expansive basis for establishing jurisdiction over defendants in Europe.
The predominant basis for determining the appropriate court before which to bring proceedings in Europe, in accordance with Regulation 44/2001, is the courts of the country in which the defendant is domiciled. A defendant may, however, be sued in a member state other than its place of domicile, where the claimant can establish that it is the place where a harmful event has occurred, under article 5(3) of the regulation.
The application of article 5(3) is, however, regarded very much as a derogation from the general domicile test, and as such the courts have tended to interpret the provisions of article 5(3) restrictively…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Bristows briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Bristows
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Bristows
The High Court has held that in certain circumstances the European Insolvency Regulations 1346/2000/EC may effectively extend the jurisdictional reach of the English courts.
Where monies are improperly paid out of a company, they may be traced through various accounts to the end recipient, even if each stage in the laundering cannot be identified.