Police ordered to pay Human Rights Act damages for failure to conduct an adequate investigation into allegations of rape
By Katarina Sydow
In a decision handed down on 23 July 2014, the High Court has found that the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) must pay damages of £22,250 and £19,000 respectively to claimants DSD and NBV for failing to conduct an effective investigation into the rapes and other sexual offences committed by John Worboys, the so-called ‘Black Cab Rapist’, between 2002 and 2008 (DSD & NBV v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis  EWHC 2493 [QB]).
In February 2014, the High Court held the MPS liable to the claimants under the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998. Both DSD and NBV were raped by Worboys, DSD in 2003 and NBV in 2007, as were approximately 100 other women. The failure by the MPS to carry out an adequate investigation into the complaints made by the claimants and other women amounted to a breach of the state’s positive duty under article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to investigate allegations of conduct amounting to torture and/or inhuman or degrading treatment.
In the instant decision, Green J helpfully restated the law on damages under the HRA 1998 in relation to (1) whether an award should be made and (2) the quantum of such an award, and considered the effect of other relief granted ‘in relation to the act in question’ under section 8(3)(a) HRA 1998…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Outer Temple Chambers briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Outer Temple Chambers
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Outer Temple Chambers
The Supreme Court on 11 March 2015 handed down a unanimous judgment that confirms that the Bolam test does not apply to a doctor’s duty to warn patients of the risks of treatment.
An important judgment has been handed down that deals with the remedies available to members of the IBM Project Waltz scheme.