Planning applications: Burridge v Breckland District Council
This case, in the Court of Appeal, considered the difficult but familiar point of whether a planning application, which itself proposes a ‘below the EIA threshold’ development, must be treated as part of a wider project. The case involved two separate but linked planning applications. The first — a biomass renewable energy plant — would provide gas, via an underground pipeline, to the second proposal — a CHP plant on a separate site. The two applications were ‘functionally interdependent’ — and both were on the table. The Court of Appeal quashed both permissions. The council should have treated them as a single project (‘one overall application’) for screening purposes, which would have meant the threshold would have been exceeded. The cases of Swale and Candlish were distinguished.
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why