Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004
By Saskia Molecamp
In R (on the application of Hampton Bishop Parish Council) v Herefordshire Council & others (2013), the High Court addressed the proper interpretation to be given to section 38(6) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, which requires that a determination made under the planning acts must be made in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.
A judgment (Colman v SoS for Communities and Local Government) that stated that it is a ‘fundamental and long-established principle of planning law that something identified as a “material consideration” is conceptually distinct from considerations identified in the development plan’…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why