Picard v Primeo: Cayman Court considers assistance in a post-Rubin world
The dicta of Lord Hoffman in Cambridge Gas and HIH supporting the application of the principle of “modified universalism” have provided a foundation for the recent trend in the law relating to international insolvency towards greater assistance provided to foreign insolvency proceedings.
In summary, the principle of modified universalism is that there should be a unitary bankruptcy proceeding in the court of the bankruptcy’s domicile which receives worldwide recognition and it should apply universally to all the bankrupt’s assets. In practice, domestic courts follow this principle by recognizing foreign officeholders that are empowered by foreign law to act on behalf of an insolvent company. Central to this principle is the idea that such recognition, “carries with it the active assistance of the court” and that in providing such assistance, “the domestic court must at least be able to provide assistance by doing whatever it could have done in the case of a domestic insolvency.” In theory, the principle should ensure fairness between creditors, so that there would be no advantage to creditors located in a jurisdiction where more assets are located…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mourant Ozannes
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
What is the role of the Royal Court of Jersey in trustee applications for directions regarding disclosure of trust information?
A recent application has raised the issue of the function of the court, namely whether the court was exercising its own discretion in supervising, and intervening, in the administration of a trust.
Royal Court clarifies limits of customary law exception in respect of time-barred breach-of-trust claims brought by incoming trustee
Where a newly incorporated PTC recently appointed as successor trustee seeks to bring claims for breach of trust against predecessors, it will not be able to benefit from empêchement d’agir.