Phoenix companies: prohibited names
When a limited liability company fails and a director of that business continues to trade under the same or a similar name after its failure, there is often disquiet. This is particularly the case where the director is thought to have acquired the assets of the company at a knock-down price from the liquidator of the old company, despite the company leaving a raft of unpaid creditors.
The law attempts to prevent this ‘phoenix phenomenon’ by proscribing the use of a ‘prohibited name’ except in certain circumstances, criminalising contravention of the rules and making anyone guilty of such contravention personally responsible for all debts of the new company.
The relevant provisions are contained in sections 216 and 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
Yasmin Prest won her landmark divorce ruling when the Supreme Court ordered Mr Prest’s companies to transfer to her a number of properties as part of her lump-sum award.
The Court of Appeal has declined to introduce the detailed guidelines on awards for injury to feelings for discrimination into the DPA regime.