Phoenix companies: prohibited names
When a limited liability company fails and a director of that business continues to trade under the same or a similar name after its failure, there is often disquiet. This is particularly the case where the director is thought to have acquired the assets of the company at a knock-down price from the liquidator of the old company, despite the company leaving a raft of unpaid creditors.
The law attempts to prevent this ‘phoenix phenomenon’ by proscribing the use of a ‘prohibited name’ except in certain circumstances, criminalising contravention of the rules and making anyone guilty of such contravention personally responsible for all debts of the new company.
The relevant provisions are contained in sections 216 and 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
Obesity is estimated to affect around one in four UK adults. The EU advocate-general’s recent non-binding opinion may give rise to significant implications for employers.
The fact that an employee is on sick leave is a relevant consideration when determining whether a delay in resigning would prevent a claim for constructive dismissal.