Pharmaceutical sector — clarification on approach to market definition for prescription medicines
A decision handed down by the UK Court of Appeal earlier this month provides useful guidance on the correct approach to defining the market in relation to pharmaceutical products. The Court of Appeal held that a patented pharmaceutical product should not be regarded as a distinct market. In its judgment, the Court of Appeal dismissed Chemistree’s appeal, affirming the High Court’s refusal to grant an interim injunction against the supplying pharmaceutical company for an alleged abuse of dominance. The Court of Appeal ruled only on the dominance aspect of the case and concluded that it was, therefore, not necessary to address the allegations of abuse.
AbbVie is a pharmaceutical research and development company that manufactures the patented product Kaletra, a medicine used in HIV treatment. Chemistree is a prescription home delivery and medicine administration service. In 2005, Chemistree entered into a supply agreement with AbbVie for the supply of Kaletra for home delivery in London. Specifically, the contract was entered into in order for Chemistree to fulfil its contractual obligations with NHS Trusts to deliver HIV medicine to patient homes across the City of London.
Over a period of time, Chemistree’s demand for Kaletra rose, spiking at the end of 2012 to more than three times the volume it required at the start of that year. As a result, AbbVie found it had a shortage of supply for the UK market. It requested a breakdown from Chemistree as to its requirements, in order to verify stock supplies to meet UK patient needs and not to meet wholesale purchases. It transpired that Chemistree had also been including in its orders for Kaletra additional quantities of the medicine for prescriptions outside of the UK (to Lithuania) and also for wholesale activities. Just 15 per cent of the total volume of product ordered at the end of 2012 related to the homecare supply contract…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Taxation Office released a draft ruling on the Goods and Services Tax treatment of bitcoin transactions on 20 August 2014.
DLA Piper’s ‘Life sciences: patent extension strategies and antitrust global update’ video covers global antitrust and competition issues including product hopping and reverse payment patents.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.