Perils of mediation — what solicitors need to know
The recent Court of Appeal decision in Frost v Wake Smith and Tofields Solicitors is a good starting point for reviewing the duties of a solicitor arising out of a mediation and the potential negligence actions and claims for wasted costs which could result from a breach of those duties.
Thiswas a claim made by a client against his solicitor arising out of a mediation that took place in 2003. The mediation concerned a long-running, wide-ranging and acrimonious dispute between two brothers, David and Ron Frost, who had been in business together for about 20 years.
Through the almost miraculous efforts of the mediator, an agreement was reached at the mediation. The brothers went out to dinner to celebrate, leaving David’s solicitor to draw up the settlement agreement. After dinner they returned and signed the agreement. Ron subsequently raised various objections to the agreement and the brothers ended up mediating on a second occasion. The dispute was resolved – well, except for the tax consequences of the agreement that the Court of Appeal noted were still unresolved – after an order was made for specific performance of the second settlement agreement in 2005…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
The Court of Appeal has handed down its decision in Mitchell v News Group, resolving recent uncertainty about the implementation of Jackson reforms — at least for the time being.
There is an implied term allowing a paying responding party under an adjudication award six years from the date of payment to challenge the adjudicator’s decision.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why