Pensions speedbrief — scheme closures and benefit changes: High Court sheds light on some dos and don’ts
The High Court, in IBM UK v Dalgleish & others, found that an employer had breached its implied duty of good faith in the way it went about closing its defined-benefit (DB) schemes to the future accrual of benefits. This speedbrief looks at the case and its practical implications for employers and trustees who are considering (or have previously carried out) DB benefit change exercises.
This significant case was heard by Mr Justice Warren, who himself describes the judgment as ‘stupendously long’ — it weighs in at 434 pages. The facts are very complicated and involve more than 5,000 members spread over two schemes and various benefit structures.
In summary, IBM decided to make a range of changes to two of its DB schemes between 2009 and 2011. This was known as ‘Project Waltz’ and involved closure to the future accrual of benefits, imposing new early retirement terms and withholding pay rises from DB scheme members who did not agree to break the link between DB pension accrual and final salary…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
Technology acquisitions round-up — Facebook acquires LiveRail; Apple acquires Beats Electronics; and more
In this briefing, Eversheds sets out a choice pick of mergers and acquisitions from 2014 so far.
In Carewatch Care Services v Focus Caring Service and Others, Mr Justice Henderson had to consider the enforceability of standard post-termination restrictions.
Analysis from The Lawyer
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe