Pensions speedbrief — scheme closures and benefit changes: High Court sheds light on some dos and don’ts
The High Court, in IBM UK v Dalgleish & others, found that an employer had breached its implied duty of good faith in the way it went about closing its defined-benefit (DB) schemes to the future accrual of benefits. This speedbrief looks at the case and its practical implications for employers and trustees who are considering (or have previously carried out) DB benefit change exercises.
This significant case was heard by Mr Justice Warren, who himself describes the judgment as ‘stupendously long’ — it weighs in at 434 pages. The facts are very complicated and involve more than 5,000 members spread over two schemes and various benefit structures.
In summary, IBM decided to make a range of changes to two of its DB schemes between 2009 and 2011. This was known as ‘Project Waltz’ and involved closure to the future accrual of benefits, imposing new early retirement terms and withholding pay rises from DB scheme members who did not agree to break the link between DB pension accrual and final salary…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Eversheds briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Eversheds
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Eversheds
Case supports the view that a claim for breach of statutory duty is possible in relation to a contract award by a public body beyond the scope of the procurement regulations.
Tools that can be used to: minimise the risk of disputes; formulate and respond to claims; and resolve disputes.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Eversheds is no stranger to an international tie-up but now it’s in the market for the jewel in its global crown
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all